The Devon railway carriage standing in an agricultural field near Georgeham must be removed after an enforcement appeal failed. Inspector M Bale dismissed the appeal on 15th October 2026 and upheld North Devon District Council’s notice, which gives six months for the land to be cleared.
The case concerns land south-west of Forda, near Braunton, within the North Devon Coast National Landscape and the locally defined undeveloped coast. The owner wanted to retain the carriage and its short length of railway track for storage, while accepting that other items listed in the notice would go.
I would read the Devon railway carriage decision as a useful reminder that limited visibility does not make an unusual structure acceptable in a protected landscape. The Inspector accepted that only a few public viewpoints revealed the carriage, but found its form, position and lack of a countryside need conflicted with the character of the area.
Why the Devon railway carriage appeal failed
North Devon District Council issued the enforcement notice on 26th March 2025. It alleged an unauthorised change of use of agricultural land to storage, involving the railway carriage, track, railway items, a red van, scaffolding, windows and a timber platform structure.
The notice requires the open storage use to cease. It also requires removal of the carriage and track, all other stored items and any rubbish or debris created while complying. The six-month compliance period starts when the notice takes effect.
The appeal was made under ground (a) of section 174(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. In plain English, that asked the Inspector to grant planning permission for what the notice alleged, rather than arguing that no breach had occurred or that enforcement action was too late.
The appellant narrowed that request. He indicated that the notice would be followed apart from the carriage and track, so the Inspector considered whether planning permission should be granted for a storage use consisting of those two items.
A railway object in a rural landscape
The site lies in steep, rolling countryside close to a small cluster of homes and other buildings at Forda. The carriage stands slightly apart from that group, in a field above the appellant’s home. Beyond the cluster, the Inspector described the landscape as generally open and undeveloped.
The Devon railway carriage was modest in scale and painted in muted colours. It was also visible from relatively few places because of the topography. Neither point overcame the more fundamental problem identified in the decision.
Inspector Bale found that a railway carriage and short section of track were not features normally associated with this landscape. Their position towards the middle of the field, away from established boundaries, introduced a structure which was, in the Inspector’s words, “at odds with its context”.
That judgement was not limited to whether the carriage was ugly or conspicuous. The relevant North Devon and Torridge Local Plan policies seek to maintain local distinctiveness, landscape character and the undeveloped coast. The Inspector found that putting an incompatible structure into the field conflicted with those aims even though views were limited.
Renovation and planting would not cure the issue
The decision makes clear that repairing or repainting the carriage would not resolve the planning objection. Its railway character and field location would remain. The Inspector also found no evidence showing how extra planting or landscaping would overcome the harm.
This matters because applicants sometimes treat screening as a complete answer to landscape objections. Screening can reduce visibility, but it does not necessarily make a use or structure belong in its setting. Planning policy can protect the character and distinctiveness of a landscape, not merely particular views from roads and footpaths.
The Devon railway carriage decision therefore turned on the relationship between the object and the place. A structure can be small, partially hidden and capable of renovation yet still be unacceptable because its location and purpose are not supported by the rural context.
The former mobile home did not provide a fallback
There had previously been a mobile home on the land. A lawful development certificate confirmed that it could remain for recreational purposes involving storage and music rehearsals. The appellant referred to earlier council advice suggesting that the mobile home might be replaced by the carriage.
The Inspector distinguished that position. The former mobile home site was closer to field boundaries and slightly lower in the landscape. The claim that the carriage’s present location was less prominent had not been supported by a detailed landscape appraisal or other convincing evidence.
Even a mechanism giving up the ability to return a mobile home to its certified position would not have been enough. The appellant had not demonstrated that retaining the carriage where it now stands would cause less harm than using the former lawful site.
The Devon railway carriage also had no demonstrated need to occupy this countryside location. Local Plan policy controls rural development to uses meeting local economic or social needs which genuinely need to be in the countryside. The fact that the appellant had no other land available did not supply that justification.
A possible tourism use carried no weight
The appellant suggested that a future application might seek to use the carriage for tourism. The Inspector did not assess whether such a project could be acceptable because no tourism proposal formed part of the appeal.
That distinction is important. An intention to prepare a different scheme later does not establish that the use currently before the decision-maker is acceptable. Its design, access, servicing, landscape effects and local benefits would need to be tested through the proper application.
The Inspector also refused to let the carriage remain temporarily while those ideas were developed. There was no certainty that a tourism application would be made or approved, and the notice already allowed six months for compliance.
What the enforcement decision means
The ground (a) appeal failed, planning permission for the storage use was refused and the enforcement notice was upheld without variation. The operative requirements therefore remain in place, including removal of the carriage, its track and the other stored material.
For the Devon railway carriage, the practical result is removal rather than an opportunity to submit landscaping details later. Anyone facing a similar notice should identify exactly which ground of appeal fits their case and provide evidence addressing the planning merits, lawful fallback positions and any claimed countryside need.
The official Planning Inspectorate case record lists appeal APP/X1118/C/25/3364624 as complete and provides the full decision. Planning Geek’s planning enforcement guide explains the wider enforcement process and the different appeal grounds.
The Devon railway carriage decision does not mean that every repurposed rail vehicle is unacceptable in the countryside. It shows why the use, location and evidence must be considered together. A carriage connected to a properly justified tourism, heritage or agricultural proposal could raise a different planning balance, but that was not the scheme before this Inspector.
0 Comments