Planning Geek logo

Planning consultancyBacked by the UK's leading planning resource

PLANNING NEWS

Hounslow Local Plan seeks comments by 29th October

Inspectors invite existing Hounslow plan representors to comment on specified post-hearing documents by 5pm on 29th October 2026.

by | 9th October 2026 10:19

The Hounslow Local Plan examination has reopened a narrowly defined opportunity for written comments following the publication of evidence requested by the inspectors. Hounslow Council issued invitations on 8th October 2026, with responses due by 5pm on Thursday 29th October.

This is not another general consultation on the plan. The invitation goes to people and organisations that made representations at the Regulation 19 stage, whether or not they attended the examination hearings. Submissions must deal with specified examination documents, not reopen the entire planning strategy.

The distinction matters for developers, landowners and community groups concerned about housing delivery, employment land, site allocations or the relationship with London-wide policy. A focused response to the new evidence may carry weight; an attempt to introduce an unrelated objection or fresh material may not be accepted.

Need to respond to the Hounslow examination?

Planning Geek can review the published evidence and help prepare a focused, properly scoped planning representation.

Hounslow Local Plan: who can submit comments?

The Council says that, at the inspectors’ request, it contacted everyone who submitted representations during the plan’s Regulation 19 consultation. That stage ran from 6th September to 28th October 2024. The current opportunity is therefore directed towards an existing group of representors rather than any member of the public making a first submission.

Participating in an earlier hearing is not a condition of responding now. Conversely, the invitation does not create an unrestricted right to raise new issues about a preferred development site. Anyone considering a response should first check the Council’s 8th October examination notice and confirm that the points fall within the listed material.

The inspectors have suggested a maximum of 3,000 words in total per representor. They have also directed that additional evidence should not be submitted. Concise references to a particular document and explanation of its bearing on soundness or legal compliance are more useful than repeating the whole original objection.

The documents at the centre of the invitation

The most immediate documents include EX78, the updated housing background explanation; EX79, the revised housing trajectory; EX80, the employment background paper; and EX81 with its related affordable workspace material. Together these provide a refreshed evidential picture of what the plan proposes to deliver and when.

The inspectors also identify EX82a, the September 2026 table of suggested modifications. Responses on this document must address only the changes highlighted in yellow or gold. Unhighlighted wording is not a new opening for objections simply because it appears in the same table.

Other potentially relevant material includes EX74 to EX77, covering examination correspondence, the August 2026 National Planning Policy Framework and housing delivery measurements, plus EX83 to EX106 and EX107 relating to London-wide evidence and additional employment information. The full document list is in the Council’s examination library; the official list, not a blanket invitation, governs the permissible scope.

Why the London Plan position matters

One unusually important clarification concerns the new draft London Plan. The inspectors say that consultation on that emerging document remains ongoing and adoption is not expected soon. For the purposes of assessing whether the Hounslow Local Plan is in general conformity, they will therefore continue to use the adopted London Plan 2021.

The distinction between adopted development plan policy and emerging evidence can alter an examination argument. New housing, employment, transport and environmental studies may still help inspectors understand the wider context, but publication of a consultation draft does not automatically displace the adopted strategic plan.

Hounslow has published EX106, a council note addressing evidence issued for the draft London Plan. Representors relying on that material should distinguish clearly between an up-to-date fact, the weight attached to an emerging proposal and the statutory status of the adopted strategic policy.

Housing trajectory, deliverability and allocations

The updated housing trajectory is likely to attract particular attention because an examination does not test housing numbers only in the abstract. The timing of site delivery, existing permissions, infrastructure dependencies and the realistic phasing of large sites can all affect whether the proposed strategy is effective.

Representors should identify any specific inconsistency between the revised trajectory and the accompanying explanatory material, if one exists. A general assertion that more or fewer houses are desirable will not answer the inspectors’ limited invitation. Nor should figures from different base dates be compared without explanation.

The background to the Hounslow Local Plan includes the consolidation of earlier area-based proposals into a single borough-wide document covering 2020 to 2041. The plan was submitted for examination in June 2025. Site allocations therefore sit within a broader strategy that the inspectors must test as a whole.

Employment land and affordable workspace

Employment is another focus of the published examination updates. Documents EX80, EX81 and related appendices address employment needs and affordable workspace, matters with practical consequences for redevelopment proposals, industrial capacity and the balance between housing and commercial uses.

For a land promoter, it may be necessary to explain how revised demand or supply assumptions bear on an identified site. For an occupier or business association, the strongest comments are likely to be tied to a specific finding or proposed policy mechanism. Neither group should assume that this stage permits wholly new alternative schemes.

The revised NPPF published in August 2026 appears among the papers identified by the inspectors. Its relevance is a matter for the examination; its presence on the list does not amount to a pre-judgement that the emerging local plan is sound or unsound. Planning Geek has separately reported on the Planning Inspectorate’s approach to the new NPPF.

How to respond before 29th October

Comments must reach the Council by 5pm on Thursday 29th October 2026. The examination notice gives the email address [email protected] and also accepts postal submissions to the Spatial Planning and Infrastructure Team, Hounslow House, 7 Bath Road, Hounslow TW3 3EB.

Representors are asked to send a copy to the programme officer, Charlotte Glancy, through Banks Solutions. The notice provides the relevant email and postal details. Anyone working close to the deadline should allow for both deliveries, rather than assuming one recipient will forward the submission to the other.

The Council’s notice states that the inspectors are unlikely to accept late comments or material introducing additional evidence outside the specified documents. There is no advantage in filling the 3,000-word allowance: a short document-by-document explanation of the point and its consequence is the better approach.

What happens after the new representations?

The inspectors have indicated that the Council will have until Thursday 12th November 2026 to respond to written comments received in this round. They expect to provide further information on the examination’s next steps during November.

The public hearings began on 13th January 2026 and ended on 2nd July. The subsequent documents emerged from the action list generated during the last hearing week. The current exchange is a post-hearing evidence exercise, not an announcement that more hearings have been fixed or that adoption is imminent.

A further examination stage, main modifications consultation or an inspectors’ report should not be assumed until announced. Likewise, no finding of soundness follows merely from the Council having submitted its updated papers. All of these are separate procedural steps.

Practical implications for applicants and landowners

The immediate action is to review the official EX documents against any existing Regulation 19 representation. A proposed change to an allocation, revised trajectory assumption or employment policy may justify a targeted response, particularly where the new document answers a criticism raised previously.

For planning applications in the meantime, the emerging Hounslow Local Plan remains a material consideration whose weight depends on its stage, unresolved objections and consistency with national policy. It has not replaced the adopted statutory development plan merely because examination hearings have finished.

This Hounslow Local Plan update also illustrates the value of keeping a documentary trail: original representation, relevant inspector question, updated evidence and precise reply. The Council’s examination page should be checked for further instructions before submitting.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Affected by this story, or spotted something we should check? Report an issue with this article

Planning news by email

Get the latest Planning Geek stories in one daily digest.

Finding Planning Geek useful?
Buy Ian a coffee to say thanks

Media enquiries

Journalist, broadcaster or producer? Need a quick comment on a planning story, policy change or decision?

Request a comment →

YouTube

Planning Geek on YouTube

Watch Ian explain permitted development, use classes, planning applications and current planning changes.

Watch on YouTube

Latest planning news

Need advice on your project?

Planning Geek can help with planning strategy, applications and permitted development.

Ask us for a fee proposal