The Lloyds house price index shows UK prices were unchanged in September, leaving the average home at £298,441 and annual growth at exactly 0.0%.
That headline is softer than the latest Nationwide measure, which still showed annual growth of 0.8%. The bigger story in Lloyds’ figures, however, is the regional split: Northern Ireland is up 7.4% over the year while London is down 2.2%.
Housing activity is subdued too. Lloyds points to fewer residential transactions and mortgage approvals, although prospective buyer enquiries have risen to their highest level since February. The picture is not a crash, but it is a market with little national price momentum and sharply different local conditions.
Planning a housing scheme in a changing market?
Planning Geek can help with planning strategy, applications, appeals and the planning evidence needed to move a housing proposal forward. Market conditions matter, but they need to be considered alongside the actual planning position for the site.
Lloyds house price index shows a market at a standstill
The September release records no monthly movement after August’s revised 0.3% fall. On a three-month basis prices were 0.2% lower, while the annual measure was unchanged.
The average UK property price edged from £298,395 in August to £298,441 in September. That £46 movement is effectively flat and underlines why the index is describing a market where prices are proving resilient rather than one that is advancing.
Lloyds’ September House Price Index says the housing market has been fairly subdued during a period of higher mortgage rates. Mortgages Director Andrew Asaam said buyer caution is being balanced by continuing underlying demand.
He also pointed to a more encouraging forward indicator: new enquiries from prospective buyers are now at their highest level since February. Lloyds expects any near-term house-price movement to remain modest, with confidence likely to determine whether demand strengthens through the remainder of 2026 and into 2027.
Nationwide and Lloyds are telling a similar, but not identical, story
Planning Geek reported last week that Nationwide’s September index showed annual house-price growth slowing to 0.8%, with prices down 0.2% month on month.
The Lloyds series is different, with its own mortgage data, methodology and sample. Its September reading puts annual growth at 0.0%, while the monthly figure is also flat. The two indices should not be treated as interchangeable, but both point towards weaker momentum than earlier in the year.
Lloyds is also the index previously published under the Halifax name. Its series runs back to 1983 and calculates a standardised house price after adjusting for the mix of properties and seasonal effects.
That methodological difference matters. A small gap between competing monthly indices is not evidence that one is right and the other wrong. For planning and development decisions, the useful message is that national price growth is currently weak across more than one major measure.
Northern Ireland rises 7.4% while London falls 2.2%
The national flatline hides a striking regional divide.
| Area | Annual change | Average price |
|---|---|---|
| Northern Ireland | +7.4% | £231,917 |
| Scotland | +3.4% | £223,330 |
| North East | +2.4% | £184,546 |
| North West | +1.9% | £248,932 |
| Wales | +1.2% | £231,287 |
| West Midlands | +0.8% | £260,892 |
| Eastern England | -1.6% | £330,151 |
| South East | -2.1% | £380,829 |
| Greater London | -2.2% | £531,548 |
Northern Ireland has strengthened from 6.8% annual growth in August to 7.4% in September, reaching a record average price of £231,917. Scotland also remains positive at 3.4%, while Wales has accelerated to 1.2%.
Within England, the strongest performance remains in the north. The North East is up 2.4% and the North West 1.9%. The West Midlands is the only other English region with positive annual growth in the Lloyds release.
Southern England is markedly weaker. London records the largest annual fall at 2.2%, followed closely by the South East at 2.1%. Eastern England is down 1.6%.
For developers, that regional spread is more informative than the UK average. The sale value and absorption assumptions behind a housing scheme are local, not national. A site in Belfast, Manchester or Newcastle may be operating in a very different market from one in outer London or the South East.
Transactions and mortgage approvals are still weak
Lloyds’ supporting activity data gives the flat price reading more context.
HMRC provisional figures show UK residential transactions fell 1.5% in August on a seasonally adjusted basis to 95,220. Transaction volumes were 3.9% lower in the three months to August than in the preceding three months, and 1.9% below August 2025.
Bank of England figures show mortgage approvals for house purchases fell to 54,918 in August. That was 1.8% lower than in July and 16.0% below a year earlier.
RICS survey evidence was less negative than before, but still weak. New buyer enquiries improved from a net balance of -26% in July to -19% in August, while newly agreed sales improved from -28% to -17%.
Those indicators do not prove that housebuilding will fall. They do show that the sales environment for new and existing homes remains cautious, with borrowing costs affecting both demand and transaction volumes.
First-time buyer prices are little changed
The average first-time buyer property in the Lloyds data costs £236,779, only slightly above August’s £236,568 and still below the £241,244 record reached in February.
Lloyds highlights the deposit as one of the main barriers to ownership. It also points to the Government’s recently announced Your First Home scheme, alongside the wider availability of low-deposit mortgages, as measures that could help some buyers enter the market.
The scheme is particularly relevant to development because it is intended to support eligible new-build purchases in England. But the key details, including income limits, local property-price caps and implementation arrangements, are not expected until the October Budget.
That means it is too early to treat the scheme as a proven demand stimulus for housing sites. The final rules will determine how many buyers and developments can actually benefit.
What the figures mean for planning and housing delivery
The Lloyds house price index is not a planning dataset, and it should not be used as a shortcut for scheme viability. It tells us about mortgage-backed house-price movements and the wider sales market, not the planning merits or financial performance of a particular development.
But the figures do matter to the commercial environment in which planning permissions are turned into completed homes. Developers, lenders and landowners will be watching achieved prices, sales rates, mortgage availability, incentives and buyer confidence alongside build costs, finance, infrastructure and planning obligations.
Planning Geek has already reported that the housing planning pipeline has fallen sharply. That is a separate issue from house prices. A weaker pipeline concerns the stock and flow of consented development, while Lloyds is measuring the market into which homes are eventually sold.
The two pressures can coexist. Government can seek faster planning decisions and more permissions while builders remain cautious about how quickly completed homes can be sold at assumed values.
That distinction becomes especially important when discussing viability. A national index showing flat prices does not automatically justify revisiting affordable housing or other obligations. Any viability case needs scheme-specific evidence and should be tested against local values, costs, finance and policy requirements.
A flat national figure is hiding a fragmented housing market
September’s Lloyds release leaves the UK market in an unusual position. Prices are flat both monthly and annually, yet Northern Ireland is recording strong growth while London and the South East are falling.
That fragmentation is likely to matter more to planning and development than the national 0.0% headline. Housing delivery depends on local demand, local values and the pace at which buyers can access mortgage finance.
The immediate market signal is therefore one of caution rather than collapse. Price resilience remains, enquiries are improving and some regions are still growing strongly, but transactions and approvals are weak and higher borrowing costs continue to weigh on activity.
For the development sector, the practical point is simple: national housing targets may be set centrally, but the market conditions that determine whether individual schemes move quickly from permission to construction and sale remain intensely local.








0 Comments