![R (Lisle-Mainwaring) v RBKC [2024] EWHC 440 (Admin)](https://www.planninggeek.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Planning-Enforcement-Case-Law-980x653.jpg.webp)
Planning condition case law
Browse 43 cases in the Planning Geek Case Law Library concerning Planning condition.
![Tesco Stores Limited v Dumfries and Galloway Council [2026] CSOH 95](https://www.planninggeek.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tesco-Planning-Challenge-Dumfries-980x653.jpg.webp)
Tesco Stores Limited v Dumfries and Galloway Council [2026] CSOH 95
Scottish section 42 retail judgment: NPF4 Policy 28 and LDP2 Policy ED6 were compatible, and Tesco’s judicial review failed.
![John Lund v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor [2026] EWHC 2474 (Admin)](https://www.planninggeek.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Grampian-Condition-Highway-Works-980x653.jpg.webp)
John Lund v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor [2026] EWHC 2474 (Admin)
John Lund confirms that statutory highway powers and funding do not establish deliverability where the authority is unlikely to initiate the necessary works.
Dunoon Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and Poole Borough Council, 65 P & CR 101
Dunoon held that a condition limiting premises to specified uses did not, on its wording, exclude permitted development rights under the development order.
Lazari Properties 2 Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2023] EWHC 2026 (Admin)
Lazari confirms that a planning condition can continue to restrict uses despite later changes to the Use Classes Order where its wording and purpose require it.
