The Ashford HMO controls, concerning houses in multiple occupation (HMOs), have moved a step forward after councillors backed work on a new Article 4 Direction on 15th October 2026. The resolution could eventually extend planning control over conversions from ordinary homes to small HMOs across more of Ashford borough.
Nothing new has come into force yet. The council must gather evidence and return to Planning Committee, which will decide whether the case supports borough-wide coverage or only particular areas, and whether any Direction should take immediate or non-immediate effect.
That distinction matters if you own, buy or advise on property in the borough. I would treat the Ashford HMO controls vote as authority for the next stage of work, not as removal of permitted development rights or a fixed commencement date.
What the Ashford HMO controls vote actually did
The Council considered two motions. The first sought an immediately effective Direction for a defined inner Ashford area bounded by West Street, Elwick Road, Station Road, Wellesley Road, Somerset Road and Forge Lane. That motion was not carried.
Councillors then approved a broader resolution. It asks officers to collect the evidence and bring a report to Planning Committee at the earliest opportunity. The committee will consider whether the evidence justifies coverage across the borough or in one or more targeted areas.
The resolution also leaves the timing route open. A non-immediate Direction would normally be made well in advance of its operative date, while an immediate Direction can remove the specified right as soon as it is made but carries a different compensation risk. Until the committee has considered the evidence, neither route should be presented as settled.
This means the Ashford HMO controls are approved in principle, not made, confirmed or operative. The exact boundary, legal form and date remain to be decided.
Why Ashford is considering wider controls
Ashford already has an HMO Article 4 Direction in parts of the urban area. The Council minutes refer to existing coverage in much of Beaver ward, Aylesford and East Stour ward, Bybrook ward and several smaller areas.
Outside a relevant Direction, national permitted development rights can allow a change from a dwellinghouse in Use Class C3 to a small house in multiple occupation in Use Class C4. A house in multiple occupation (HMO) in Class C4 is normally occupied by three to six unrelated people who share facilities such as a kitchen or bathroom.
An Article 4 Direction does not ban an HMO. It removes a specified permitted development right, meaning that the proposed change must be considered through a planning application. The council can then assess matters such as the concentration of HMOs, residential amenity, parking and the character of the area against its development plan and other material considerations.
Councillor Bill Barrett’s proposal sought an immediately effective Direction within a defined inner-town area. Councillors did not adopt that route. Instead, the resolution requires officers to assemble evidence and bring the geographical coverage and timing options back to Planning Committee.
The approved motion reflected concerns from members about HMO growth, waste, parking and the loss of family housing. It also followed the removal of an automatic councillor call-in route for planning applications, which some members believed made formal controls more important.
Borough-wide coverage is not yet established
The wording of the resolution is easy to overstate. It refers to making a Direction in parts of the borough not already covered, but expressly makes that subject to Planning Committee deciding where the evidence demonstrates that Article 4 coverage is justified.
Officers have also been asked to consider whether the evidence supports borough-wide coverage or a more limited geographical area. In practical terms, the Ashford HMO controls could emerge as a borough-wide Direction, several targeted areas or a narrower extension to the existing controls.
I would therefore not advise anyone to mark every address in Ashford as newly restricted. The current legal position depends on whether the property lies within the existing Direction and whether any separate planning condition or restriction applies.
The safest check remains the actual Direction and map published by Ashford Borough Council. Planning Geek maintains an HMO Article 4 table, while our Article 4 guide explains how Directions remove particular permitted development rights without changing the underlying use classes.
Immediate and non-immediate routes
The Planning Committee will need to consider timing as well as geography. A non-immediate Direction usually gives owners advance notice and can reduce compensation exposure, but conversions may continue under the permitted development right during the notice period.
An immediate Direction can stop reliance on the specified right from the date it takes effect. It must then follow the statutory notification and representation process and be confirmed within the applicable period if it is to remain effective.
Compensation is not automatic simply because an immediate Direction is made. The statutory rules involve the timing of the Direction, a qualifying planning application and evidence of loss or abortive expenditure. Even so, the potential liability is a legitimate factor when a council chooses between immediate and non-immediate action.
For Ashford, those choices have not been made. The Ashford HMO controls remain at evidence-gathering stage and there is no reliable date for a Planning Committee report.
What property owners should do now
Anyone considering an HMO conversion should first establish whether the property falls inside Ashford’s existing Article 4 area. If it does, the C3 to C4 permitted development route may already have been withdrawn and a planning application may be required.
If the property lies outside the current area, the council vote does not by itself create a new planning requirement. However, the emerging policy is relevant to timing and risk. Buyers and developers should monitor the committee papers rather than assume that a borough-wide Direction is certain or that the current position will remain unchanged.
Planning and HMO licensing are separate systems. A licence regulates housing management and standards, while planning controls the use of land and buildings. Securing or holding one does not automatically resolve the other.
Existing lawful HMO uses would not automatically become unlawful if a new Direction were introduced. Article 4 action normally affects future reliance on the withdrawn permitted development right. Evidence of when a use began, who occupied the property and how the accommodation operated may still be important where lawful use is disputed.
What happens next
Officers must now complete the evidence work and report to Planning Committee. The committee papers should reveal the recommended boundary, whether the Direction would be immediate or non-immediate, and the evidence relied upon.
If a Direction is made, the council must publish the legal document and map, notify affected interests and invite representations. A later confirmation decision may also be required, depending on the route chosen.
The Ashford HMO controls story is therefore significant, but it is not the finished legal event. Council has committed to pursuing the issue, while the evidence, boundary, timing and statutory process still stand between the vote and any new planning restriction.
0 Comments