Planning consultancyBacked by the UK's leading planning resource
Planning consultancyBacked by the UK's leading planning resource
More Case Law reports from Planning Geek. Return to the first page of this news archive for the latest stories and our introduction to the topic.
The High Court has continued East Herts Council’s Sawbridgeworth planning injunction, including court-attached powers of arrest, after the authority used a Temporary Stop Notice, injunction and enforcement notice.
The High Court has quashed permission at 1 Burlington Lane after Hounslow councillors were not properly told what an earlier Planning Inspector had decided about the fallback scheme.
The High Court has continued the Aldermaston planning injunction after finding that all but one family moved onto the land after the original order. Planning merits remain separate, and 5th October was a provisional cessation date rather than a final deadline.
Royal Mint Court challenge dismissed: the High Court upheld Chinese embassy planning permission despite arguments over diplomatic premises, security evidence and human rights.
Maidstone v King: the High Court imposed a six-month suspended sentence after repeated and deliberate breaches of planning injunctions at a countryside site.
Whitewebbs BNG report: the High Court quashed Spurs’ training ground permission; Spurs has now applied to the Court of Appeal for permission to appeal.
Greystoke CB: High Court quashes an appeal decision after the NPPF highway impact threshold and a 23% biodiversity net gain were left out of the final planning balance.
Blackpool secured a section 187B planning injunction against an unauthorised Traveller site despite repeated PSED failures. We examine why, and what the judgment means for planning enforcement.
A Class MA office-to-flats conversion at 32 Palace Court led to a £380,326 CIL demand. Herod explains why a developer expecting nil CIL should resolve liability before starting work.
Segrue v Swindon shows why a CIL review deadline must be protected: informal discussions and Regulation 65 did not rescue the missed statutory route.
The Chalfont St Peter Green Belt challenge targets the Secretary of State’s 975-home decision under section 288; the High Court has yet to rule.
The High Court in Di Mambro held that quashing a timely Class R prior-approval decision does not retrospectively trigger paragraph W deemed consent.
A Dartmoor LDC appeal was dismissed after the Inspector found domestic facilities were insufficient to make the windowless Soda Ash Building a C3 dwellinghouse under Gravesham.
Journalist, broadcaster or producer? Need a quick comment on a planning story, policy change or decision?
Planning Geek can help you understand the options for your property or development.
