Planning consultancyBacked by the UK's leading planning resource

← Case Law Library

Planning unit case law

Browse 19 cases in the Planning Geek Case Law Library concerning Planning unit.

Titchfield Festival Theatre Limited v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 368

Titchfield lawful use reversion is an important Court of Appeal judgment on what lawful use remains available when an unauthorised material change of use is enforced against. The court held that section 57(4) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 requires a counterfactual exercise: assume the development being enforced against had not occurred, then ask what use of the land would have been lawful. The creation of a new planning unit did not, by itself, extinguish earlier lawful use rights.

West Suffolk Council v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Ors [2025] EWHC 861 (Admin)

West Suffolk Use Class E is a leading Planning Court judgment on two parts of Class E: medical or health services provided principally to visiting members of the public, and research and development of products or processes. Mrs Justice Lang dismissed West Suffolk Council’s statutory review. Specialist services did not fall outside Class E(e) merely because visitors required a referral, and the Inspector was entitled to treat the Animal Health Trust’s research activities as Class E(g)(ii).

Esther Gurvits and Joseph Gurvits v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and London Borough of Barnet [2024] EWHC 490 (Admin)

Gurvits home office enforcement is a useful High Court authority on when a business use in domestic outbuildings becomes a separate planning use, and on how an enforcement notice interacts with existing lawful or permitted rights. The court dismissed the owners’ section 289 appeal. The Inspector had been entitled to find that three former domestic outbuildings had become a single, more intensive commercial office and storage planning unit, and that removing the office facilities and reconnecting the buildings to lawful domestic use did not unlawfully extinguish future permitted rights.

James Turner v (1) Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (2) Buckinghamshire Council [2025] EWHC 2815 (Admin)

Turner enforcement notice service is an important Planning Court judgment on serving an enforcement notice where a large planning unit is occupied by numerous changing businesses. The court held that conspicuously fixing the notice to entrance gates across the only means of access could amount to valid service on occupiers under section 329(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The council did not have to attach a separate copy inside every individual compound.

Empire Communications Limited and Oakenfield Enterprises Limited v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and London Borough of Camden [2026] EWHC 817 (Admin)

Empire serviced apartments is an important Planning Court case on the planning use of flats operated as short-term serviced accommodation. The court upheld an Inspector’s conclusion that the relevant use was a sui generis serviced-apartment use rather than ordinary C3 dwellinghouses. It also confirms that London’s 90-night short-letting rule does not itself decide the planning-use classification.